Imam Hasan bin Ali,
the fifth of the Khulafa-e-Raashidoon
By: Syed-Mohsin Naquvi Ramadhan-al-Mubarak
1426 A.H.
The fifteenth day in this holy
month of RAmadhan is the birth anniversary of Imam Hasan bin Ali.
The
terms, Khilaafat‑e‑Raashida
and Khulafa‑i‑Raashidoon are in common use today in Islamic writings,
both by Muslims as well as by non‑Muslim writers. It wasn't always
so. Let us discuss the historical background of the evolution of
these terms in the writings on Islam and Muslims.
Let us
first define those terms here. The first four Khaleefas who came one
after the other, after the passing away of the Prophet (pbh), namely:
Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and Ali are Khulafa‑i‑Raashideen (or Raashidoon),
and their period is known as the Khilafat‑i‑Rashida. This period is
also known as 'Ala minhaj an‑Nuboowah, or, the period
similar (lit. on the same path) to that of the Prophethood.
Let us begin at the point in
time when the period of the Umayyad rulers was already over, and the
Abbasids had fully established their power.
If we go back in history and
search for this term of Khilafat‑e‑Raashida or Khulafaa‑i‑Raashidoon,
we will not find them in any of the writings of the pre‑Abbasid
period. It is extremely difficult though, to find such writings (those
produced before 150 year of Hijra) in their original texts.
We can however, deduce this by reading the other sources
available and analyzing them in the proper background and context.
Here is our view and analysis of the known facts.
If one asks the average Sunni Muslim, he/she would give the
above mentioned four names for the 'rightly guided Khalaeefas' of the
Prophet. However, the Sunni scholars have had to include Hasan bin Ali
as the fifth of the 'rightly guided' in most of their works. We have
said: 'have had to include.' Why? Let us explain.
There is a hadeeth of the Prophet of Islam which is employed to
authenticate the notion of 'Khilafat‑i‑Raashidah,’ which goes as
follows:
Khilafat will last in my
Ummah for thirty years, then there are kings.
So, if we separate the period of
Imam Hasan, those 30 years cannot be completed. That is why the
scholars have had to include the period of Imam Hasan in the
terminology of Khilafat‑i‑Raashidah. (The Prophet passes away in the
11th year of Hijra. Imam Ali is assassinated in the 40th year of Hijra.
That only makes 29 years. Imam Hasan abdicates from worldly rule in
the 41st year of Hijra. That makes the one extra year to complete the
30.)
As already stated, after the treaty between Mucawiyyah
and Imam Hasan was signed, Mucawiyyah ordered people to
come and acknowledge him as the sole ruler of the Muslim kingdom,
which they did in most areas. That year was coined as the year of Jamacat,
and the historians write about the Muslim community from that point on
as Ahl al‑Sunnah wal-Jamaca.
Let us
see where the word SUNNA came from. There is another very well-known
hadeeth of the Prophet which has been preserved by both Shica
and Sunni scholars, as follows:
I am leaving among you two valuable things (thaqalayn) –
Allah’s book and my ITRAT; they will not separate from each other
until they come to me at the Pond, so if you attach yourselves to
those two, never ever shall you go wrong.
This hadeeth was so well
known that it was causing serious problems to the cause of Banu Umayya.
After all, they had taken over the KHILAFA by displacing the
Ahlul-Bayt (the ITRAT of the Prophet). The court paid fuqaha and
Qadhees came to the rescue of the ruling party. A parallel hadeeth was
coined and given currency by the government, as follows:
I am leaving among you two
valuable things – The Book of Allah and my Sunna (SUNNATI instead of
ITRATI)………..
The word
SUNNA was taken from this distorted version of the hadeeth and put
together with the decree of Mucawiyyah in which he had
proclaimed the YEAR OF JAMACAT, to formulate the term Al-Sunnat
wal-Jamacat.
During
the entire period of the Umayyad rule, the Khaleefa was just Khaleefa,
so were the first four of them. The term Raashid and Raashidah were
never used. In the period of the Umayyad rule, the court‑historians
had prepared a list of the Khaleefas of the Prophet. The names of Imam
Ali and Imam Hasan were not included in that list, for obvious
reasons. In that period, the continuous names were:
(1) Abu Bakr, (2) Umar, (3) Uthman, (4)
Mucawiyyah, (5) Yazeed, (6) Marwan.
It was common
practice that the official pulpits were used to praise these names
while abuse was thrown at Imam Ali. How could they include Imam Ali in
the list of the Khaleefas? In fact, the common word in
Syria was that Ali was not even a Muslim. When news arrived
in
Syria that Imam Ali had been assassinated, people asked as
to how he was killed. When the answer was given that he was killed
inside the mosque, they would ask: What was Ali doing inside a mosque?
That was the extent of the anti‑Ali propaganda inside
Syria.
The event of
Karbala shook the foundations of the Umayyad tyranny. The
Abbasids took advantage of the popular sentiment and made political
capital out of it. They now became the avengers of the blood of Ahl
al‑Bayt; and with that premise, the Abbasids took over the rule of the
state. However, now they faced a unique dilemma.
If they had accepted the legitimacy of the Khilafat of Mucawiyyah
and company, their own claim to that seat would be thrown out the
window. If they had cancelled the entire concept of Khilafat, then how
would they legitimize their own being in the driving seat? If they had
done that, they would have to revert to the Qur’anic theory of Imamat,
that is, the notion of IMAM MANSOOS MIN ALLAH, which would force their
hand to give the khilafat (or the worldly leadership) back to the
members of the Ahl al‑Bayt.
Once again, the court‑paid political spin doctors, Qadhees and
Fuqaha, came up with the combined formula of Khilafat‑i‑Raashidah (the
period of Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and Ali) and the Khilafat‑i‑Ghayr
Raashidah (the Umayyad period). That was the best way to connect the
Abbasid rule with that of the Prophet of Islam, going through the
Khaleefas who were rightly guided and cutting those off who were not.
So, in
fact, this notion of Khilafat‑i‑Raashidah was an urgent need for the
emerging Abbasid dynasty, which, eventually, became the backbone of
the Islamic political theory as elaborated by the Sunni Muslim
scholars at large.
By the time the great works
of Hadeeth, Tafseer and jurisprudence were being compiled (the second
and the third centuries of Hijra) this notion was widely accepted, in
fact fully embraced by the Muslim world at large. It had become one of
the basic tenets of faith in Islam. Even today when you go to the
Grand Mosque in Makkah, you will find those four names inscribed on
the pillars of the mosque. Actually there are a total of twelve
pillars in the mosque. So, those four names are repeated three times.
Raashid (masc.) and Raashidah (fem.) both
mean 'rightly guided.'