Holy
Imams (A.S.) - Clear and Coherent Policy
S.J Hussain
A question has puzzled some believers a
great deal, namely why did al-Husayn fight with the sword, while his
successors refrained from doing so, especially as all the Imams
subscribed to a single and coherent ideology. For, if al-Husayn, in
spite of the small number of his followers rose up against injustice,
demanding his usurped rights, why did Imam al-Sadiq, for example, not
rise up when the numbers of his partisans had increased.
This question necessitates knowledge of the circumstances faced by al-Husayn,
compared to those which faced the other Imams, so that we can recognise
our task today.
It is, naturally, well-known that the Prophet started his mission peace-
fully and secretly, and that this continued for more than ten years.
During these years he succeeded in forming a group of followers, who
firmly believed in the new message and rejected everything which was
connected with the time of the jahiliyya. Eventually the Prophet felt
that this group was capable of confronting the power of the jahiliyya,
and so raised the jihad with the sword, and, after a bitter military
struggle, succeeded in founding the Islamic state in Medina. This hard
task which led to the Prophet's establishment of a new society, was
left, in its entirety, to Imam Ali, so that he could complete what the
Prophet had initiated, as regards the complete elimination of the
beliefs of the Jahiliyya, and then establish a society which would base
its relationships upon the prescribed rule of God's law.
However Imam Ali did not come to power immediately after the death of
the Prophet. On the contrary he was prevented from achieving power, and
had but a few loyal supporters, having discovered that many of those who
had been converted to Islam had only embraced it externally, without
true belief in their hearts, and acted according to the customs of the
Jahiliyya, while covering it with a superficial belief in Islam. Such a
situation confirmed the predictions of the Quranic verse which says, "If
he dies or is killed you shall turn your backs" (Imran, 144), that is
you shall return to your old beliefs. The Imam found that he could not
rise to recover his rights, so he did net rebel. but strove throughout
his life, to organise a group of sincere believers from among the
Community, attentive to the objectives of the new religion, believing in
the legitimacy of Ali's claims to the Imamate, and applying the Sunna of
the Prophet in their daily lives. When he finally came to power, after
the death of Uthmans Imam Ali did not demand silence as regards economic
and political corruption, but rather encouraged the Community to purify
their hearts and their actions, and fought those Muslims who sought to
exploit the Islamic expansion to their own ends, or inter- preted the
laws of Islam according to their own desires and interests, at the
expense of those of society at large.
Imam Hasan's Peace Treaty
Al-Hasan followed in the footsteps of his father in the fight against
the power of the Jahiliyya, and against some of the Muslims, whose souls
had not been purified by the fear of God, and who were exploiting the
economic and political advantages of the Islamic expansion into Syria.
For this reason he continued to fight and encourage his followers in
their struggle, but some of his followers refused to obey his com- mands,
and one even tried to assassinate him in al-Mada'in, which resulted in
al-Hasan's receiving a serious leg injury, which contributed to his
later agreement to a truce.
The splits amongst the followers of al-Hasan, and the spread of the
disturbances amongst his army on, one hand, and the unity of the
opposition and their insistence on continued hostilities on the other,
forced al-Hasan to sign the truce with Mu'awiya. Some of the most
important stipulations of this truce was that Mu'awiya would not
endanger the life or the properties of al-Hasan's followers, or curse
the People of the House, in the mosques, and that al-Husayn should
succeed Mu'awiya on the death of the latter.
Imam Husayn's Stand
Imam al-Husayn committed himself to acting according to the stipulations
of this agreement, whereas the opposition, during the twenty years of
Mu'awiya's rule, systematically broke the points of agreement one after
another. In the last years of his rule Mu'awiya designated Yazid as his
successor, thus breaking his promise to al-Hasan, that al-Husayn would
succeed him.
Al-Husayn had been keeping a careful watch on the activities of Mu'awiya
during his rule, and had, accordingly, prepared his followers for any
eventuality. In the light of what reached him from Iraq al-Husayn
believed that the people were ripe for rebellion on one hand, while, on
the other hand, he noticed that the Community as a whole had become
stagnant and needed somebody to bring it back to life Therefore he
advanced towards Kufa and, in spite of the fact that the Kufans who had
previously premised to help him, had withdrawn their support and
listened to the overtures of the authorities, he determined to fight
despite the fewness of his followers, until all of theme perished at the
Battle of Kerbala.
From this it is clear that al-Husayn's decision to fight was by no means
an innovations but rather a continuation of the policy of his brother,
father and grandfather, as regards opposition to the power of the
Jahiliyya whenever possible. The assassination of al-Husayn led al-Sajjad
and the other Imams to adopt their quiescent policy towards the auth-
itories who had seized power, because he realised that:
i. (Firstly) In spite of their numbers, the followers of al-Husayn did
not possess sufficient loyalty to surrender themselves and their
possessions in the path of God, according to the instructions of the
Imam;
ii) (and secondly) Many of the Community were unaware that al-Husayn was
the rightful Imam and the leader of the Islamic community, by the
Prophet's designation, just as they were unaware that the existing
authorities were illegal.
Imam Sajjad's Policy
For this reason we find al-Sajjad following a policy of silence towards
the authority of the Umayyads, however this silence did not indicate
recognition of their authority, but rather that his own followers were
few. Similarly his isolation from society was by no means an escape from
reality, but was in fact tacit oppesition to the corruption and tyranny
which had brought about the assassination of al-Husayn, the burning of
the Ka'ba, and the attacking and plundering of the Ciy of the Prophet,
which had lasted for three days.
Al-Sajjad, during the time of his Imamate, concentrated his efforts on
purifying the souls of his people and encouraging fear of God in their
acts and in their statements, giving priority to the purification of the
soul by applying the rules of God firstly upon the individual, discourag-
ing him from the self-interest which had contributed to al-Husayn's
death. Al-Sajjad's intentions were to bring together a group of sincere
Muslims, who adhered to the objectives of Islam and performed its rules,
called people to obey God in their actions before their tongues, and
followed the Imam in all things. Furthermore, al-Sajjad insisted that
his followers understand that any war with the sword could only be a
jihad, if the one who proclaimed it possessed the necessary quality of
calling people to God through his acts rather than his statements. It is
stated that he mentioned the following Qur'anic verse,
"They are the ones who turn to God in repentance, who worship him, who
praise him, who go about in the land serving him who bow down to God,
who prostrate themselves in prayer, who enjoin good and forbid evil, and
who watch the limits set by Allah And give glad tidings to those who
believe."
(113, Tawba). Thereafter he stated, "When we find those who possess
these attributes, jihad with them is better than the Pilgrimage." (Kafi,
5/22).
Imam al-Baqir followed his father's policy and did not rebel against the
Umayyads, and advised his brother, Zayd, not to rise in arms against the
illegal authority of the Umayyads, because the Community was not
sufficiently politically aware to rebel against the government. So
al-Baqir began to disseminate political awareness in the Comrnunity, by
means of Prophetical traditionst just as he commanded sorne of his
followers to remind the people of al-Husayn's struggle and his martyr-
dom during rthe Hajj each year, thereby hoping to kindle the feelings of
the Community, to move their hearts and to inflame their emotions so
that they could sympathise with the ideology of revolution for upright
causes. For, the time of the Hajj is one of gathering for Muslims from
all countries, and the dissemination of the objects of the struggle and
martyrdom of al-Husayn, and the illustration of his close relationship
to the Prophet, encouraged both complaint and doubt concerning the
legitimacy of the authorities, which in turn created a fertile
environment for a movement towards bring about their downfall.
Imam Baqir(A.S.) and Imam Sadiq's Endeavour
Despite the fact that the cultural activities of al-Sajjad and al-Baqir
drew a large number of followers to them, al-Baqir did not consider them
suitable for rebellion, because they lacked the necessary loyalty and
organisation. Al-Kulayni reports that 'Abd Allah b. al-'Ata once said to
al-Baqir, "Indeed your party is large in Iraq. By God, there is nobody
amongst your people like you. So why do you not rise in arms?" So he
replied, "O 'Abd Allah b. al-'Ata, you have taken to listening to the
masses." While it is also related that al-Sadiq himself did not count
the large number of his followers as an integral part of his plans for
revolt. On the contrary, he gave precedence to their faith, their fear
of God, their courage in standing by the truth, and their loyalty and
obedience to the Imam.
The resolute policies of the Imams al-Baqir and al-Sadiq, were not
unplanned, but were in fact based on bitter experience. Many reports
state that the plans of the Imams involved a rebellion in 70 A.H., but
the martyrdom of al-Husayn delayed these plans. There is also evidence
in these plans of a revolt to be staged in 140 A.H. But due to the lack
of organisation amongst the Imam's followers, and their inability to
keep the date of the revolution secret, their plans became known to
their enemies, and so, the later Imams did not inform their followers of
any subsequent intended uprising.
From this survey, it is clear that the Imams actually possessed a clear
and coherent policy. For example Imam Ali made a truce with the
contemporary rulers when he had only a few followers, but, when the
numbers of his followers increased, he took arms openly, and similarly
al-Hasan fought when he and his party were strong, but made a truce in
the time of weakness. Al-Husayn did likewise, and rebelled in the way of
God, depending upon the loyalty of the Kufans, while the other Imams
refrained from doing so, until they had established a strong body of
loyal followers, capable of transforming the ideology of the Community
in favour of God's law.
The main task of the faithful at the present time, is to cleanse
themselves of any act related to the era of the Jahiliyya, and this can
be achieved by following the orders of God, as illustrated by the
behaviour and daily life of the Prophet and his Household. Every
believer who claims alleg- iance to the present Imam should present his
allegiance and his loyalty to the Imam by performing the obligatory
commands and rules, such as the prayers, fasting, the zakat, the Hajj,
and by showing obedience to the legal 'Ulema of Ahl al-Bayt, following
their instructions and calling people to good and forbidding evil acts.
Similarly they should perform actions which strengthen the social ties
of society and establish it firmly and safely, such as obedience to
parents and relations, respect towards neighbours, trustworthiness in
agreements and contracts, loyalty in their occupations and in their
dealings with people and to the country in which they live.
The one who is loyal to Ahl al-Bayt and the Imam of the Age, is the
person who refrains from bad deeds, such as polytheism, disobedience to
their parents, slandering women as adultresses, killing innocent people,
lying, theft, the drinking of alcohol and any act which separates one
from God.
If the faithful perform the obligatory deeds, refrain from what is for-
bidden and obey God loyally, this will lead to the establishment of a
society free from complexity and corruption, in which the faithful can
be sincerely loyal to the commands of the Imam of the Age. |