Islam
and the Question of Violence
Seyyed
Hossein Nasr
Despite the
presence of violence in many regions of the world ranging from Ireland
to Lebanon to the Pacific Basin and involving many religions from
Christianity to Hinduism, the Western world associates Islam more than
any other religion with violence. The Muslim conquest of Spain, the
Crusades - which were not begun by Muslims -, and the Ottoman domination
of eastern Europe have provided a historical memory of Islam as being
related to force and power. Moreover, the upheavals of the past few
decades in the Middle East and especially movements using the name of
Islam and seeking to solve problems of the Muslim world created by
conditions and causes beyond the control of Muslims have only reinforced
the idea prevalent in the West that in some special way Islam is related
to violence.
To
understand the nature of Islam and the truth about the assertion often
made of Islam's espousal of violence. it is important to analyze this
question clearly remembering that the word islam itself means
peace and that the history of Islam has certainly not been witness to
any more violence than one finds in other civilizations, particularly
that of the West. In what follows. however, it is the Islamic religion
in its principles and ideals with which we are especially concerned and
not particular events or facts relating to the domain of historical
contingency belonging to the unfolding of Islam in the plane of human
history
First of
all, it is necessary to define what we mean by violence. There are
several dictionary definitions that can be taken into account such as
'swift and intense force', 'rough or injurious physical force or
action', 'unjust or unwarranted exertion of force especially against the
rights of others', rough or immediate vehemence' and finally 'injury
resulting from the distortion of meaning or fact'. If these definitions
are accepted for violence, then the question can be asked as to how
Islam is related to these definitions. As far as 'force' is concerned,
Islam is not completely opposed to its use but rather seeks to control
it in the light of the divine Law (al-shari'a). This world is one
in which force is to be found everywhere, in nature as well as in human
society, among men as well as within the human soul. The goal of Islam
is to establish equilibrium amidst this field of tension of various
forces. The Islamic concept of justice itself is related to equilibrium,
the word for justice (al-'adl) in Arabic being related in its
etymology to the word for equilibrium (ta'adul). All force used
under the guidance of the divine Law with the aim of re-establishing an
equilibrium that is destroyed is accepted and in fact necessary, for it
means to carry out and establish justice. Moreover, not to use force in
such a way is to fall prey to other forces which cannot but increase
disequilibrium and disorder and result in greater injustice. Whether the
use of force in this manner is swift and intense or gentle and mild
depends upon the circumstances, but in all cases force can only be used
with the aim of establishing equilibrium and harmony and not for
personal or sectarian reasons identified with the interests of a person
or a particular group and not the whole.
By
embracing the 'world' and not shunning the 'kingdom of Caesar', Islam
took upon itself responsibility for the world in which force is present.
But by virtue of the same fact it limited the use of force and despite
all the wars, invasions, and attacks which it experienced. it was able
to create an ambiance of peace and tranquillity which can still be felt
whenever something of the traditional Islamic world survives. The peace
that dominates the courtyard of a mosque or a garden whether it be in
Marrakesh or Lahore is not accidental but the result of the control of
force with the aim of establishing that harmony which results from
equilibrium of forces, whether those forces be natural, social or
psychological.
As for the
meaning of violence as 'rough or injurious physical force or action',
Islamic Law opposes all uses of force in this sense except in the case
of war or for punishment of criminals in accordance with the shari'a.
Even in war, however, the inflicting of any injury to women and
children is forbidden as is the use of force against civilians. Only
fighters in the field of battle must be confronted with force and it is
only against them that injurious physical force can be used. Inflicting
injuries outside of this context or in the punishment of criminals
according to the dictum of the shari'a and the view of a judge is
completely forbidden by Islamic Law.
As far as
violence in the sense of the use of unjust force against the rights of
others and laws is concerned, Islam stands totally opposed to it. Rights
of human beings are defined by Islamic Law and are protected by this Law
which embraces not only Muslims but also followers of other religions
who are considered as 'People of the Book (ahl al-kitab)'. If
there is nevertheless violation in Islamic society, it is due not to the
teachings of Islam but the imperfection of the human recipients of the
Divine Message. Man 15 man wherever he might be and no religion can
neutralize completely the imperfections inherent in the nature of fallen
man. What is remarkable, however, is not that some violence in this
sense of the word does exist in Muslim societies, but that despite so
many negative social and economic factors aggravated by the advent of
colonialism, overpopulation, industrialization, modernization resulting
in cultural dislocation, and so many other elements, there is less
violence as unjust exertion of force against others in most Islamic
countries than in the industrialized West.
If one
understands by violence 'rough or immoderate vehemence'. then Islam is
totally opposed to it. The perspective of Islam is based upon moderation
and its morality is grounded upon the principle of avoiding extremes and
keeping to the golden mean. Nothing is more alien to the Islamic
perspective than vehemence, not to say immoderate vehemence. Even if
force is to be used, it must be on the basis of moderation.
Finally, if
by violence is meant 'distortion of meaning or fact resulting in injury
to others', Islam is completely opposed to it. Islam is based on the
Truth which saves and which finds its supreme expression in the
testimony of the faith, la ilaha illa 'Llah (there is no divinity
but the Divine). Any distortion of truth is against the basic teachings
of the religion even if no one were to be affected by it. How much more
would distortion resulting in injury be against the teachings of the
Qur'an and the tradition of the Prophet!
In
conclusion it must be emphasized that since Islam embraces the whole of
life and does not distinguish between the sacred and the secular, it
concerns itself with force and power which characterize this world as
such. But Islam, in controlling the use of force in the direction of
creating equilibrium and harmony, limits it and opposes violence as
aggression to the rights of both God and His creatures as defined by the
divine Law. The goal of Islam is the attainment of peace but this peace
can only be experienced through that exertion (jihad) and the use
of force which begins with the disciplining of ourselves and leads to
living in the world in accordance with the dicta of the shar'ia.
Islam seeks to enable man to live according to his theomorphic nature
and not to violate that nature. Islam condones the use of force only to
the extent of opposing that centripetal tendency which turns man against
what he is in his inner reality. The use of force can only be condoned
in the sense of undoing the violation of our own nature and the chaos
which has resulted from the loss of equilibrium. But such a use of force
is not in reality violence as usually understood. It is the exertion of
human will and effort in the direction of conforming to the Will of God
and in surrendering the human will to the divine Will. From this
surrender (taslim) comes peace (salam), hence islam,
and only through this islam can the violence inbred within
the nature of fallen man be controlled and the beast within subdued so
that man lives at peace with himself and the world because he lives at
peace with God. |