MUHARRAM AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE (7)
By:Syed-Mohsin
Naquvi
1 February 2006
This is the seventh article in the
series on Muharram and its significance.
We began this series with an
introduction to the concept of Imamat in Islam. The first article in
this series introduced that concept from the holy Qur’an. The second
article presented a view of the same concept from Hadeeth by way of
a book review.
In the third of the series
we looked at the historical background of the ceremony of Hajj and
its connection to the event of
Karbala.
In the fourth article of
the series we came back to the direct historical background of the
Karbala story itself. We quoted a passage from a Ph.D.
thesis on Islamic history and presented to our readers the
background of how Yazeed came to power in the month of Rajab of the
60th year of Hijra and he commanded the governor of
Madinah to send for Husayn and insist on his Ba’yat. Husayn left
Madinah on the 28th of Rajab for Makkah after having
refused to that demand.
Husayn stays
in Makkah until the month of Zil-Q’adah. During that stay he
receives a number of letters from the people of
Iraq who were asking him to come to
Iraq and free them from the oppressive rule of the
Umayyads. Husayn does not respond to those letters for a while. His
friends exhort him not to go to
Iraq.
In the fifth of this
series we discussed how the event of
Karbala has been viewed in history. In that we quoted
some of the opinions expressed by great scholars in the past both
Muslim as well as non Muslim. We ended that discussion with a
question. The question posed was: How could different people view
Karbala with such different opinions? How could one
person view Karbala as the epitome of supreme human sacrifice in a
great cause, another would look at it simply as a struggle for power
between two parties and yet another would rule that Imam Husayn was
killed quite legitimately because he had raised the banner of revolt
against a legitimate Muslim government?
In the sixth article we
discussed the question as to whether it was Allah’s Will that the
murderers of Imam Husayn and his companion would killed him. If that
was the case then there is no reason to curse the murderers because
they were acting on Allah’s Will.
In this article we would
go back to the various opinions recorded about
Karbala and take them one at a time to explore those
issues.
Was the Event of Karbala a power struggle between two parties?
To answer this question fully, let us
look at the social, political and economic situation in the Muslim
kingdom in the 60th year of Hijra:
-
Makkah and Madinah were still
inhabited by a large number of those people who had seen the Prophet
and had been able to spend some time with him.
-
People who were born after the passing
away of the Prophet, were in their 20’s, 30’s, 40,’s and 50’s. That
means two new generations of Muslims had grown up who had had no
contact with the Prophet.
-
Islam had spread beyond the confines
of
Arabia. There was a large number of Muslims who did not
speak Arabic and many new Muslims lived in places such as
Iraq,
Iran and
Egypt, as well as other places.
-
The civil war which had begun as a
protest against the high-handed policies of the third Khaleefa
Uthman had taken its toll on the community. The community had split
in groups – There were the main stream populace who were bewildered
and forced to follow the party in power without much consideration
to morals, ethics and the basic principles of Islam; they were more
concerned with their daily bread. Then there were the special
interest groups, the family of the Prophet of Islam who were
basically ghettoized inside the city of
Madinah. The family and the adherents of Banu Umayya, who
were in power and they had concentrated on
Damascus as their base. There were other groups, who were
though unhappy with Banu Umayya, but lacked the wherewithal to do
anything about it. There were the Kharijees, who had, though, been
subdued by Imam Ali during his rule, their remnants were still
lurking in the wilderness and they would make raids here and there.
The tribes of Bedouins, who had been defeated by Islam and Muslims
and they had accepted Islam as a last resort – in the process of
their defeat at the hands of the Muslims in the early years, a great
number of their warriors had been killed in battlefields, mainly at
the Battles of Uhud, Khandaq and Hunayn. Most of those fighters were
killed by Imam Ali or by other Muslims led by Imam Ali.
-
Yazeed son of Mu’awiyya was born some
20 years after the passing away of the Prophet. He had now become
the ruler of the kingdom on his father’s will. Yazeed’s mother was a
Syrian Christian Bedouin woman. Yazeed had grown up reciting poetry,
drinking, dancing, hunting, riding, and just playing around in the
wilderness of the Syrian countryside.
-
Husayn son of Ali, was the youngest
grandson of the Prophet of Islam, being the son of his daughter
Fatima. He was 57 years old at this time. Husayn had seen Islam
taking shape in his own house. He had seen how diligently and
faithfully his own father Ali had served Islam and Muslims under the
leadership of the Prophet. He had also seen how his father sat
quietly and patiently waiting on the sidelines while other
insignificant people took over power and ruled the community. Husayn
had also seen how the community had betrayed his brother Hasan.
-
If anyone had visited Madinah in those
days, he would not see any pomp and circumstance associated with the
family of the Prophet. They were not poor but neither were they
powerful people in the community by any stretch of the imagination.
The seat of the government lay some thousand miles away in
Damascus where major governmental decisions were made.
Husayn was not in a position to have been able to exert any
influence on the government of the time.
-
Yazeed was the most powerful despot in
the Muslim world.
-
The question is: Why did Yazeed bother
to exert pressure on Husayn to acknowledge his B’ayat? Husayn was
one man, and he was without much power of any kind or even tribal
loyalties in the city of
Madinah or around it. Ever since his elder brother Hasan
had died of poisoning in the 49th year of Hijra, he had
been living in Madinah very quietly.
-
Usually, historians write that because
of his father Ali, there were a lot of people in
Koofa,
Iraq, who looked up to Husayn as their leader
(Imam). So, Yazeed’s asking for b’ayat was actually a pre-emptive
action to subdue the people of Koofa.
-
But the point is, the people of Koofa
were already subdued to a great extent. During Muawiyya’s rule,
Koofa was identified as a stronghold of pro-Ali sympathies. To
counter that, Muawiyya had let a free reign of terror against the
people of Koofa. He would send his spies and henchmen and they would
hunt for any sympathies for Ali and the Prophet’s family. If such
sympathies were found, those families would be tortured and killed.
The killing of Hujr bin Adee and his companions at a
place called Azra
is a very clear evidence to that policy and those actions.
-
Not only that, Mu’awiyyah had sent
out one of his generals named Busr bin Abi Artah, on an expedition
of the Arab lands to establish a reign of terror. The whole idea in
that expedition was to subdue people generally and terrorize them
for a long time to come.
-
How can then, we explain Yazeed’s
step?
-
To answer that question fully, we will
have to go back a little in the early history of Islam. If we go
back to the time when Uthman had been lynched by an angry mob, Imam
Ali had been acclaimed as the fourth Khaleefa of the Muslims, and he
had taken charge, we come to the point where he orders Muawiyya
deposed from his position as the governor in Damascus, Mu’awiyyah in
turn, refuses to give in to that Caliphal command and the Battle of
Siffeen takes place.
-
Mua’wiyya and his people are
thoroughly routed in the battle and they ask for arbitration. The
battle is stopped. Mu’awiyya writes a letter to Imam Ali. In that
letter Mu’waiyya makes some points as follows:
-
If both parties had known the extent
of destruction, both may have desisted from war
-
Both had been deprived of their sound
minds when they started the war
-
He asked Ali once again to leave
Syria to him, in which case he would leave the rest of
the Muslim world to Ali
-
They were both from Abd Munaf, so
neither of them could claim any merit over the other
-
Imam Ali replied to that letter point
by point as follows:
-
If he (Ali) was killed in the cause of
God and brought to life seventy times, he would not falter in his
strength on behalf of God and the jihad against the enemies of God
-
He (Ali) was not deficient in his
sound mind and did not repent for what he had done
-
As for Mu’awiyya’s demand for
Syria, he would not give him today what he refused him
yesterday
-
As for their equality in fear and
hope, Mu’awiyya was as deep in doubt as he, Ali, was in certitude
-
And the Syrians were not more eager
in pursuit of this world than the people of
Iraq were in pursuit of the other world
-
They were indeed both descended from
the same forefather, Abd Munaf, but Umayya was not like Hashim, Harb
not like Abdul Muttalib, Abu Sufyan not like Abu Talib, nor was a
Muhajir like a Ta’aleeq, or a rightful claimant like a false
pretender.
-
“In our hands is the superior merit of
prophethood through which we have humbled the proud and given pride
to the humble.”
-
We can see from this exchange that
while Mu’awiyya considered the worldly rule of the part of the
Muslim kingdom as his right only because he claimed ancestry from
the Quraysh, the tribe of the Prophet of Islam, Imam Ali considered
it as a divinely appointed office for which TAQWA and devotion to
the Islamic principles were the sole required elements without any
consideration to the ancestry. Moreover, in that pursuit, Imam Ali
was willing to sacrifice the temporal power over the preservation of
the basic principles of Islam.
-
If Imam Ali had conceded to relinquish
control of the Syrian province to Mu’awiyya as he had desired from
the very beginning, there would be no fighting and Imam Ali would be
able to rule as the fourth Khaleefa not only in Hijaz and
Iraq but also in
Egypt and
Iran. Mu’awiyya saw the whole Muslim kingdom as the
property of the children of Abd Munaf (both Banu Umayya and Banu
Hashim as well as some other small tribes). In his opinion it would
have been a legitimate division of the kingdom between two cousins.
-
Imam Ali saw the Muslim kingdom as the
Kingdom of
Allah, to which he was the heir according to the
holy Qur’an and the Prophet’s hadeeth as the Imam of the time. He
considered it both, his duty as well as right to preserve and
protect that kingdom and work for its solidarity to establish
justice in the earth. Mu’awiyya’s claim to any part of that kingdom
was frivolous, illegitimate and preposterous.
-
With that background, let us look at
Yazeed’s state of mind in the 60th year of Hijra.
-
The foremost driving force in creating
Yazeed’s state of mind in this context, was his father Mu’awiyyah’s
statement to him on his deathbed. We quote from Tabari:
“ O my son, I have spared you the
effort, made things smooth for you, subdued enemies for you,
subjected the necks of the Arabs for you, and created unity for you.
I am only afraid that four individuals of Quraysh might challenge
you for this matter which was established for you --- al-Husayn bin
Ali, Abdullah bin Umar, Abdullah bin al-Zubayr, and Abdur-Rahman b.
Abi Bakr. As far as Abdullah bin Umar is concerned, he is a man
whom righteousness has overwhelmed, and if no one else were left, he
would acknowledge you. As far as al-Husayn is concerned, the people
of
Iraq will not leave him alone until they make him rebel.
If he rebels against you, and you should defeat him, then pardon
him, because he has close kinship and a great claim. As far as Ibn
Abi Bakr is concerned, he is a man, who, if he should see his
companions doing something, he would do likewise. He is only
interested in women and pleasure. As for the one who crouches for
you as a crouching lion and tricks you as a sly fox, and if an
opportunity enables (him) he would spring, that is Ibn al-Zubayr. If
he does that to you, and you are able to overpower him, then tear
him limb from limb.”
-
In addition to this
deathbed-statement, it was the whole life of Mu’awiyya for Yazeed to
take lessons from. While Mu’awiyya had wished to divide the Muslim
kingdom between Imam Ali and himself, Yazeed moved one step ahead
and he claimed the entire kingdom for himself. He could not bear to
see a single prominent person in the kingdom living without
acknowledging him as the sole power. True to his father’s advice, he
sent a messengers to Madinah commanding the governor Waleed to
summon all those four people and ask them to acknowledge Yazeed as
the legitimate Khaleefa. Were they to refuse that, they were all to
be killed. He could not get hold of Abdulalh bin Zubayr, who
escaped to Makka in the middle fo the night and lasted until some
twelve years after the death of Yazeed. There is a very clear trace
of sarcasm in Mu’awiyya’s comment about Abdullah bin Umar. True to
his prediction, he accepted Yazeed without any qualms and actually
exhorted other people in Madina to do the same.
-
In Husayn’s refusal to do his B’ayat,
Yazeed saw an intransigent rebel, even though Husayn was actively
moving away from any violent confrontation with the government. Sure
enough, the people of Koofa had been writing to him ever since the
passing away of his own brother Hasan bin Ali. But Husayn himself
never responded to those letters.
-
Even when he left Madina on the 28th
of Rajab, he proceeded to Makka and he lived there for six months.
During those six months, he did not approach a single person from
the point-of-view of raising an army against the government. There
was no open call for a political movement against Yazeed from him.
He did not start a fund-raising campaign either.
-
When things really got very active
from the Koofan side, the only thing he did was to send his cousin,
Muslim bin Aqeel, to Koofa on a fact-finding mission. He was to meet
people in Koofa and write back to Husayn. Once again, there was no
design to show any preparation of an armed action against the
government.
-
In actual fact, Abdullah bin Zubayr
was staying in Makka at the same time as Husayn. The two of them met
several times during that period. In one meeting, Ibn Zubayr offers
Husayn military and strategic help to take his stand. Here is how
Husayn replied to that offer of help:
“ Ima Husayn explains to his
companions – He (Ibn Zubayr) told me, ‘stand up in this mosque, and
I shall gather the people around you.’ By God! I would prefer to be
killed a few inches (shibr) outside the sanctuary of Makka than to
be killed a few inches within it. I swear by God, even if I were in
a deep snake’s hole, they would pull me out in order to carry out
their will. By God! They would violate me just as the Jews violated
the Sabbath.”
-
So, we can see that Husayn had
foreseen his own murder at the hands of the Umayyad government. But
he did not want to be killed inside the holy precincts.
-
Hardly any more evidence is needed to
show that
Karbala was an unequal duel. It was nowhere near in
Husayn’s mind that he was going to rise against the government of
the time militarily.
-
The question is, why did he then
proceed to Koofa? Why did he not turn away from that journey when he
heard of the news of Muslim bin Aqeel’s killing?
-
The only logical answer is that Husayn
had never planned a military strike against the government. Husayn
had a democratic streak in him, very much like his father, Ali, had
in him and very much like his grandfather, the Prophet of Islam had.
History has seen that the Prophet of Islam lived in Makka for twelve
years – he took abuse, torture and even a death threat. But he moved
to Madina only when he found public support in Madina. Within a
period of ten years he was able to establish a full-fledged city
state due to that overwhelming public support. Very similar to that,
Imam Ali did not take any action for himself during the first three
Khilafat periods. That was because he saw that there was no public
support for his cause in the Muslim community. He accepted Khilafat
only when he saw that the Muslims wanted him overwhelmingly. Very
much like that, Imam Husayn lived in Madina for a period of eleven
years without responding to the call from the Koofans. However, when
he was pressured by Yazeed for B’ayat, he first left Madinah. When
he continued to be hounded, he looked to those areas where there was
likely to be some kind of public support for him. That is why he
proceeded towards Koofa. His plan was that if there was sufficient
public support found in
Iraq against Yazeed, then, perhaps, under his leadership,
a movement might take shape on democratic lines to influence other
parts of the Muslim world thus Yazeed could be deposed on religious
grounds without any military action. That is the only conclusion we
can draw from the fact that Husayn had taken his women and children
with him. No one takes along women and children while on a war path.
Thank you for reading.
Sincerely,
Syed-Mohsin Naquvi
|