Man &
Evolution
By Ayatullah
Muhammed Beheshti
Man and Evolution
Out of all the natural
phenomena with which we are a conversant, the living beings have a
comparatively more complex and marvelous mechanism. It may be said that
life is the apex of perfection on the scale of natural motion.
Life
No thinker belonging to any
school of thought has any doubt about the fact that‑ living beings have
characteristics which are not found in the non‑living beings. The main'
characteristics of a living being are self‑defense, adaptation to the
environment, growth and procreation. The living beings of higher
categories move from one place to another and those of still higher
category are gifted with feeling and consciousness. That is why the laws
of organic chemistry are different from those of inorganic chemistry, or
for that matter of geology.
So far as observation and
scientific experiments show, a living being is born only by another
living being and not by lifeless matter. Similarly no living being is
born suddenly and automatically. At the same time it also cannot be
doubted that a living being appeared only at a special stage of the
evolution of nature, which was naturally that of the beginning of life.
Hence a question arises as to what is the origin of life?
In this respect various
theories have been put forward. Some of them are as follows:
a. At first, life came to the
earth from some other planet in the form of living cells.
b. The material necessary to form a living cell consequent on receiving
the required energy under certain conditions, was accidentally
transformed into a living being and from that life spread to the whole
earth.
c. The first living being appeared suddenly by the will of God. Now all
the developed living beings are His progeny.
d. Every species of the living beings appeared on the earth
independently. Life to each one of them was granted by God. There are
some other theories also.
We do not want to involve
ourselves into the discussion as to which of these theories is correct,
for a very extensive scientific investigation is necessary to come to a
definite conclusion in this respect.
What we would like to point
out is that the life of every living being, whether it is the result of
any evolutionary process or not, is a sign of Allah. That is what has
been emphasized by the Qur'an. "There are significant signs in your own
selves. Can you not see?"(Surah al‑Zariyat, 51:21). "Allah sends down
water from the sky and it brings the dead earth to life. Indeed in this
there is a sign for those who pay attention" . (Surahal‑Nahl 16:65).
Manufacture of living cell
If one day the scientists
succeed in manufacturing a living cell, the doctrine of those who
believe in Allah will not be affected, just as the flight of man to
other planets, the making of artificial rain, the grafting of one man's
limbs to another, the manufacture of an electronic brain and so many
other small and big inventions do not mean a clash or a rivalry with
Allah. Such things only mean fructifying the human creative power and
exploitation of natural material and its hidden forces. The Qur'an
itself urges to make use of ideas and skills and to utilize the gifts of
nature.
As we have repeatedly said,
scientific progress is a movement in the direction of divine guidance
and is not in conflict with it. Anyhow, it should not be forgotten that
human creativity does not mean the invention of a totally new phenomenon
or a norm. It only means the exploitation of the material and energy
available in nature and the bringing about of the conditions necessary
for the utilization of the laws and norms relating to them.
If really there is a
possibility of the production of life by combining natural material
under certain conditions still not known to man, then he may in future
discover the law of the origination of life and the conditions and norms
pertaining to it. If that happens, this discovery will‑ not be different
from the discovery and utilization of so many other laws already made in
the fields other than that of life.
Obviously the discovery of a
law and its utilization does not in any way lower the position of the
law‑maker. At a lower level we see that the pair of a male and a female
pave the way for the birth of a child. But do they affect Allah as the
creator? A farmer cultivates his land. But does he replace Allah as the
real creator of the crop?
If it is discovered that life
can be produced from matter under certain conditions, that will only
mean that matter in its evolutionary motion can go to the extent where
it receives life and then can go further to a higher stage. It is
interesting to note that the Qur'an, describing the birth of man,
expressly says:
"One of His signs is that He
created you o f clay" . (Surah al‑Rum, 30:20).
In fact clay becomes man, the
highest living being, after passing through so many developments. The
Qur'an also talks of the birth of man from `black clay' and Mastic
clay'. (Surah al‑Hijr, 15:28 and Surah al-Saffat, 37:11). It also says:
"We made every living thing o f water". (Surah al‑Anbiya, 21:30). When
the Qur'an has such a wide horizon, there is no reason why a Muslim who
follows it, should be narrow-minded.
Life, a Divine phenomenon
It may be pointed out that
the Qur'an expressly ascribes life to Allah. "It is He who created death
and life" . (Surah al‑Mulk, 67:2). "It is He who created you to die".
(Surah al‑Hajj, 22:66).
Do such verses mean that no
one else can make a living being? In reply it may be said: Firstly, the
Qur'an ascribes to Allah all natural changes, from coming down of rain
and taming rivers and mountains to the birth of a man. On some other
‑occasions it ascribes these very changes to natural factors also. These
two groups of verses are not contradictory, but corroborate each other,
because the scientific laws which govern natural changes are simply the
norms prescribed by Allah. His will does not mean that He directly
brings about all changes and natural events. In fact he has created a
system of natural changes. That is His will.
Secondly, if in the case of
life we find that the Qur'an has given special attention to it, that is
only a sign of its importance and high value. Allah describes it as the
infusion of divine spirit. While discussing man, we will explain what is
meant by that.
Thirdly, every evolutionary movement is a manifestation of Allah's will
and His creative design, especially if the change is such that a
material organism reaches a stage where it may receive life, become a
living being and may at last attain human life.
Evolution
The theory of evolution on
the whole has a long history. Lamarck enunciated certain principles in
this connection. But it was Charles Darwin, who carried out extensive
studies of the living organisms and the way of their birth, and gathered
enough scientific evidence to show that evolution has taken place
actually. He held that:
(a) Every living being,
wherever it may be, gradually adapts itself to its environment, and
meets its natural needs, such as obtaining food and defending itself in
accordance with the conditions prevailing in that environment. This
effort sometimes causes changes in its body, like the appearance of the
web uniting the toes of the duck when it was forced by its environment
to swim in order to look for its food in the lakes, or the lengthening
of the neck of the giraffe when it was forced to make use of the
branches of lofty trees.
(b) Though these organic changes take place gradually over many
generations, they later pass from parents to offspring.
(c) Among the living beings there is a severe struggle for the
continuation of their life, for procuring food and for selecting a
suitable mate. This struggle for existence, that is a clash with the
factors of the environment of life and rivalry with other living beings,
is a firm principle in the life of the animals and the plants and is one
of the factors which lead to the change of their form.
(d) As the result of this struggle only those organisms survive which
can adapt themselves better to their environment and can obtain the
conditions necessary for their life in their natural abode. The weaker
and the less suitable organisms gradually die out.
This way gradually the
various species are transformed, and only the fittest ones among them
survive. That is how the evolution of the species takes place. The
dissemination of the theory of the development of the living organisms,
including man, on the basis of these principles, roused a great deal of
controversy during the time of Darwin and afterwards, and views in
support of it and against it were openly expressed. At some times the
tone of the debate in this connection was scientific but on other
occasions it was rooted in religious or anti‑religious prejudices, for
it was said that what Darwin had asserted was in conflict with the
Biblical account of the beginning of the world and the birth of man as
given in the book of Genesis.
Anyhow, with new discoveries
in archaeology and the expansion in the field of experiments, the theory
of evolution has been considerably modified since the time of Darwin,
especially in regard to the questions relating to anthropology.
Many new questions in regard
to almost every principle mentioned by Darwin have arisen. For example,
it is asked whether the appearance of a new organ or for that matter any
other organic change, always results from the use of that organ and the
attempt to adapt it to one's environment or it may be due to mutation or
any other cause?
The acquired qualities are
hereditable as a principle or genetic investigations have rejected this
theory? The organic changes, whatever may be their cause, are always
aimed at survival and evolution or sometimes they may be due to the
inconsistency with the environmental conditions and may culminate in
death and extinction?
Natural selection is or is
not like artificial selection which leads the existing generation to
evolution? We find that the wild animals and plants are alike and of
average type, whereas the artificial selection gives the animals and
plants more variety and leads them to better evolution. There are many
other questions of this sort. Anyhow, in spite of all the objections
raised to discredit it, the theory of evolution has been accepted by the
scientists as an objective principle of natural sciences. At the same
time it is also certain that prominent and unbiased naturalists do not
consider this theory to be final and incontrovertible. The way to
further scientific investigation is not closed. All that they say is
that the scientific inquiry has not so far discovered any new principles
which may take the place of the principle of evolution.
Now it may be said that if an
unbiased investigator carefully examines the results of the
observations in regard to the genesis of the living organisms, he will
come to the following conclusions:
Principles which may be
discovered
(1) The living organisms in
accordance with their degree of evolution have a historical succession.
In other words, the more developed species have usually appeared over
history after the less developed ones.
(2) This historical succession is similar to that found in all other
things of the world. The entire cosmos has evolved from a simple state
and gradually galaxies and solar systems have been formed in the
environment devoid of all traces of life. Conditions conducive to the
appearance of life have developed gradually. Similarly development has
taken place successively from the plants to the developed animals. On
the whole, the more complex organism have followed the simple ones.
(3) There exists complete organic similarity between the first living
organism and the most developed living organism known to us.
(4) The stages through which a human embryo passes during its embryonic
development are fully akin to the stages through which living organisms
have passed over history.
When we put all this evidence
together, we can scientifically presume that the various species of the
living organisms are the progeny of one another (transformism) and have
not come into existence independently (fixism).
Scientific presumption,
not incontrovertible principle
Anyhow, it would be fair to
say that the conclusions at which we have arrived are no more than a
scientific guess corroborated by some evidence. They cannot be regarded
as decisive and final, for if an unbiased investigator looks carefully
at the history of the origin of machinery, he will find that the
development of various machines is not incongruous with the four
conclusions mentioned above, though the origin of the machines was not
on the basis of transformism in its modern sense, and the various kinds
of machines have not been born of one another.
In fact the scientific study of the origin of machinery also leads to
the following conclusions:
(1) The machines in accordance with their evolution have historical
succession, for the more developed ones appeared after the less
developed.
(2) This historical succession is akin to the origination of all other
things of the cosmos.
(3) There is complete organic resemblance between the first machine and
the most developed machine.
(4) The stages of the manufacture of the latest developed machine on the
whole resemble those of the development of other machines, though in a
compressed form.
In spite of all these four
points, everybody knows that the origination of the more developed
machines in the wake of the simple ones has not come about on the basis
of transformism. In other words the more developed machines are not the
progeny of the more simple ones. The evolution of the machines is the
result of man's initiative, his efficiency and the evolution of his
thinking. It is the outcome of the experience he has gained. But the
machines of superior kind are not born of those that existed before
them.
It is true that in the case
of machines basically it is not possible that a more developed one is
born of a simpler one, but in the case of living beings such a
possibility does exist. But this possibility can only support a
scientific guess. It is no proof that such a thing has actually
happened, for mere possibility of a thing is not a proof of its actual
occurrence.
We come across some other cases of evolution, in which the historical
succession of their stages is related to the evolution of the thinking
of the maker, and is the result of the gradual increase in an already
existing ability.
An example of such an evolution is the gradual attainment of knowledge
from childhood to later years.
In contrast, the evolution of the power of learning a foreign language
is connected with the development of the capability of him who learns
it, and not with that of the person who teaches him.
Conclusion
An unbiased investigator,
whether he supports the theory of evolution or opposes it, has to admit
that:
(1) As far as we know, all the existing things of the world, including
the living organisms, have a historical succession in accordance with
the degree of their evolution.
(2) We are aware of many cases in which a more developed organism is the
progeny of a less developed one.
(3) There are indications on the basis of which it may be presumed that
this is a general rule applicable to all existing things.
(4) But still this is no more than a mere scientific guess, and the way
to further investigation on the basis of contrary evidence, as mentioned
above, is still open.
(5) On the basis of the doctrine, that the world has an Almighty
Creator, who has brought the universe into existence and who manages it,
there is a complete possibility that certain developed species might
have come into existence independently in the same way as we have
described the case of the machines. Of course, in this case the creation
of the developed species is not to be the outcome of any mental
development of the Creator or His gaining any experience. It is to be
only on the basis that evolutionary motion exists in the creative design
of the world. In other words, it is the will of Allah that gradually
more and more developed species should come into being, in the same way
as there exists an evolutionary motion in the development of an embryo.
Emergence of man
According to their general
line of thinking, the scientists hold that man has evolved from the
primates, which existed before him. We leave the study and evaluation of
this evidence and other indications to the anthropologists, and confine
ourselves to making a few general remarks in regard to the origin of
man.
(1) What we have said about
the theory of evolution is also applicable to what has been or is being
said on the basis of this theory about the ancestors of the first man,
but as we have already pointed out, this theory is no more than a
scientific guess. It is still subject to further investigation and
should not be considered to be one hundred per cent final.
(2) Anyhow, it is important to note that the emergence of man on the
basis of evolution from other primates is not in conflict with the
teachings of the revealed religions, especially with the belief of an
Almighty Creator of the world. We have repeatedly mentioned in Islamic
Teachings that Allah, as described by the Qur'an, is the Creator and
Disposer of nature. Therefore the perfect system of nature is one of His
signs and not an arrangement parallel to Him or negating Him. All the
scientific discussions and efforts are aimed at only finding out this
system of nature as it actually exists.
(3) The only point which has given rise to the conception that there is
a contradiction between religion and the general principles of evolution
is that the book of Genesis of Old Testament and certain verses of the
Qur'an apparently indicate that all men existing on the earth are the
progeny of Adam, who was created independently and not evolved from any
previous living beings.
In this connection the following points are worth consideration:
(a) What, in this respect, is mentioned in the book of Genesis cannot be
taken seriously from religious point of view, because the genuineness of
many parts of Old Testament is historically doubtful.
(b) The Qur'anic verses connected with the birth of Adam generally
emphasize the point that his birth was an important event and that
Divine spirit was infused in his material body made of clay. This kind
of birth may only be described as mutation.
Thus a being made of clay came into existence. He was destined to be the
master of the earth and no other visible or invisible being could place
a total restriction on his leaning towards Allah or towards his base
desires.
(c) There is only one verse in the whole Qur'an which describes the
birth of Adam as somewhat miraculous. This verse says: "Surely Isa is
like Adam in the sight of Allah. He created him of clay, then said to
hire: `Be! and he was". (Surah Ale Imran, 3: 59)
This verse has come in the
wake of other verses relating to the Prophet Isa. The Qur'an invariably
stresses that Isa was created by Allah and that he was not His son. The
fact that he was born of Virgin Maryam and had no father is no proof of
his being the son of Allah. His birth was a supernatural event, which
took place by Allah's will, in the same way as another supernatural
event, that is the birth of Adam, the living being having Divine spirit,
occurred earlier.
It may be observed . that
this very verse shows that the birth of Adam and that of Isa are alike.
Can anybody claim that what the Qur'an has said concerning the birth of
Isa repudiates the general procedure of the birth of men all over
history? Does it deny that they are normally born of father and mother.
Not at all. In dozens of verses the Qur'an declares the system of
reproduction and procreation to be a sign of the power and the wisdom of
the Creator of the cosmos.
Hence from the Qur'anic point
of view the miraculous birth of Adam, the first living being gifted with
Divine spirit, should not be construed to mean that the Qur'an is
opposed to the theory of the emergence of the existing things of the
world or the birth of living organisms on the basis of evolution. All
that it means is that the emergence of man in an extraordinary way was a
special favor of Allah.
Exceptional Organisms
Irrespective of all that
relates to the birth of Isa or Adam, a naturalist may be asked whether
it is possible or not that in the course of the emergence of usual
organisms, some exceptional ones also come into existence? We all know
that as a rule every hand and foot of a man has five fingers; but we
also know that some children are born with six.
Similarly we know that every
human child is born with one head, but you must have read in newspapers
that there have been some exceptional cases in which children were born
with two heads. When you put up such exceptional cases to the
naturalists, they do not deny their existence, but explain them away
simply as freaks of nature. The credulous people easily accept this
explanation, but those who have a critical mind ask: If it is true that
the evolutionary emergence of the world and man is the result of the
domination of the laws of nature over all the particles of this world
and if these laws hold good everywhere, what is that factor which
disturbs them?
Does an outside factor
disturb the working of nature and the system of its laws, or the laws of
nature themselves disturb their own working? In the first case, we must
acknowledge that there exists some superpower transcending nature. In
the case of the second alternative, a question arises as to why the
possibility of the occurrence of some exceptional events, sometimes
called miracles, should be so vehemently denied and considered to be
contrary to the system of nature?
The above discussion shows
that there is not the least contradiction between the general principle
of evolution in respect of the world and man, and the teachings of the
revealed religions, and what the Qur'an says concerning the birth of
Adam and man. Incidentally the principles of evolution are still subject
to further scientific investigation, for they are faced with much
criticism especially as they were enunciated by Darwin.
As we have now finished the
discussion of the origin of man, we take up a more basic question. The
most important question, which is being overlooked in our times is:
What is the true nature of man, what is his value and what way he should
go? First we refer briefly to the position of man in the West and then
we propose to study the man of the Qur'an, so that keeping in mind the
views of the contemporary schools, we may know the approach of Islam in
this respect. |