The Concept of Ijtihad in Accordance to Shi’i Islam
by:
Samir Al-Haidari
Introduction
Muslims around the world believe that Islam is the seal of all
religions, bringing a complete and perfect message; it offers the
solution to every problem in order to ensure prosperity to mankind.
Therefore, Islam is a source for enlightenment for every need a person
may hold, the Holy Qur’an itself states:
“And We have sent down to you the Book (Qur’an) explaining all things, a
guide, a mercy and good tidings for those who submit.” [16:89]
For a religion to accomplish such a broad and demanding task, Islam does
not simply provide a set of religious rituals and practices which are
limited in time and place. With such objectives, Islam cannot only
endeavor to bring spiritual satisfaction, philosophical reasoning and
objective proofs for belief; it must also provide for the lifestyle of
people in all its aspects; only then can it truly fulfill its purpose.
In order for religion to be presented in this all-encompassing manner,
it becomes necessary that there are specialists who are capable in
deriving Islamic law, otherwise known as Mujtahideen (singular:
Mujtahid). At a stage whereby Islamic law has been derived, it can then
be presented to others who can follow it in Taqlid or imitation. This is
essential because the majority of people do not possess the necessary
expertise to derive Islamic law. This process of deriving Islamic law is
called Ijtihad.
Ijithad and its Early History
In Arabic language the word Ijtihad is of the root Juhd ‘effort’ and it
is used as a technical term to mean the process of making a
jurisprudential decision by interpretation of the sources of the Islamic
law.
One of the contemporary scholars of Shi’a Islam in the last century,
Ayatollah Muhammed Baqir Al-Sadr states:
“It is the effort
to derive Islamic laws from their original sources within one’s human
comprehension.” [1]
The term was originally predominantly used in the Sunni Schools of Fiqh
and became more common in Shi’a circles in the seventh century of the
Islamic calendar after undergoing a change of meaning. Historically,
this is because the Sunni school had a necessity for Ijtihad immediately
after the demise of the Prophet Muhammed (p), as they felt this was a
form for the continuation of Divine guidance via searching through the
textual works available to them. On the other hand, in Shi’a belief
there was a continuation of Divine guidance through the infallible Imams
(p) who represented the absolute authority in religious affairs after
the Prophet (p). The statements, acts and approvals of the Imams (p)
were considered as an authority and part of the Sunnah. Clearly with
such a belief the Shi’a did not have a necessity for Ijtihad during the
presence of an infallible Imam (p).
Hence, when questions pertaining to doctrines, social principles or
legislation arose, the Shi’a referred to the living Imam for solutions.
These were in turn dealt with through the use of Qur’anic verses or
through traditions of the Prophet (p), thus eliminating the problem
facing Sunni scholars who used Ijtihad Al-Ra’iy or other tools to deduce
ahkam such as Qiyas or Istihsan.
However, an important factor that would eventually determine the meaning
of Ijtihad according to the Shi’i school of thought was simultaneously
occurring during this period. It was widely known among the followers
(Shi’a) that soon would come a period when they would be separated from
their Divine leader because of the occultation of the twelfth Imam
called Al-Mahdi (p). Thus, many of the close companions of the Imams (p)
frequently asked them on the methodology of inferring rulings (fatawi)
from the Quran and their traditions and on the other hand, the Imams (p)
encouraged the deeper study of the principles thus making them more
prepared for the difficult times ahead. Below is a narration on account
of Imam Ja’far as-Sadiq (p), the sixth Imam in Shi’a Islam, who
elucidated this position;
Al Imam al Sadiq (p) said:
"Our duty is to teach you
the principles and your duty is to ramify." [2]
During the period prior to the occultation, with the imprisonment of the
Imams and the reduced contact between the followers and the Divine
Leader, which was followed by the Minor Occultation, the Shi’a found it
more difficult to know of solutions to rulings, particularly those
pertaining to newly emergent questions. During this era, the followers
mainly resorted to the specific deputies appointed by the Imams
themselves, in fact this is seen even as early as during the time of the
sixth Imam, as-Sadiq (p);
'Abd al 'Aziz ibn Muhtadi (a companion) said:
"I asked Imam al Rida (p),
'I am unable to meet you every time, so from whom should I take my
religious instruction?” 'Take if from Yunus ibn 'Abd al Rahman,' said
the Imam (p)." [3]
However, the Shi’a community faced greater difficulty with the advent of
the Major Occultation after the demise of the last specific deputy, Abu
al Hasan `Ali ibn Muhammad al Samari, in the year 329 AH. As a result of
which the Shi’a scholars were forced to solve the new problems by
deducing the ahkam from the available legal sources. Although, this new
phase had begun in the history of the Shi’i school of thought, many of
the scholars of the time did not refer to their practice of deducing the
laws from the available legal sources as ‘Ijtihad’. This was due to the
misconceptions surrounding this term during that period amongst the
Sunni scholars, who by their definition of Ijtihad placed the use of
Ijtihad al-Ra’iy and Qiyas on the same level as the Quran and the Sunnah
in the inferring of religious laws. Therefore many of the Shi’i
scholars, including early luminaries such as Shaykh Tusi, wrote chapters
in their books in denial of this form of ‘Ijtihad’. However, after a
change in the meaning of the term amongst circles of Sunni scholars,
Shi’a scholars adopted the use of this word positively. In general the
change in definition of the term evolved from legislating the laws
according to a mujtahid’s opinion and the analogies that he uses with
respect to the ruling that he is trying to deduce to being the
employment of maximum effort and exertion in deducing the rulings of the
shari`a from the valid proofs. This was acknowledged and accepted by the
Shi’i school of thought, and amongst the earliest users of this term in
the positive sense was Allamah alHilli in his ‘Tahdhib alUsul’. [4]
Gradually, Ijtihad found a wider meaning. Over the years, the Shia
community in different Muslim countries established centres of religious
studies called Hawza, which can be considered an equivalent to modern
universities. These Hawza’s provide education in a variety of different
subjects that are necessary in order to reach the status of Ijtihad.
Subjects include Arabic grammar and literature, logic, Qur’anic
sciences, science of Hadith, science of narrators (Ilm Al-Rijal),
principles of jurisprudence (Usul Al-Fiqh), comparative jurisprudence
and other options subjects. A Mujtahid was someone who was a master of
all these sciences in order to partake in Ijtihad.
Legitimacy of Ijtihad
What is the importance of Ijtihad, especially since we have the Qur’an
and Sunnah, which are trusted sources for guidance, is a commonly asked
question.
This has raised much discussion amongst some circles in regards to the
permissibility of man deducing his own law, as opposed to following the
Divine guidance.
Firstly, it is important to highlight that within the Shi’a school of
thought, Ijtihad not based on the Holy Quran and Sunnah, but rather on
the Mujthaids own independent opinions is forbidden and is called
Ijtihad Al-Ra’iy. However, this is not the case in the Sunni school,
because Ijtihad in itself is a source of legislation for determining
law. [5]
There are narrations in the Shi’a books which mention that every issue
which needs a ruling is addressed in the Holy Qur’an and Sunnah. The
famous scholar of hadith, Al-Kulayni, in his book Usul Al-Kafi, mentions
the following narration:
“There is no halal
(permitted thing) or haram (forbidden thing) or anything which the
people need which does not come in the Book or the Sunnah.” [6]
On this basis, Ijtihad that is permitted in Shi’i Islam is that which is
continually connected and associated to the Qur’an and Sunnah, without
which it would be void. For this reason, Ijtihad which is in
contradiction to the sources of law is invalid.
Clearly an individual who wants to return to the Qur’an and the Sunnah
for legislation must have expertise in order to identify with the
Qur’an; subjects like Tafsir, Naskh, Muhkam and Mutashabih need to be
understood. In addition, one’s abilities in Hadith need to be
exceptional in order to distinguish between the authentic from the
false. Therefore, in a similar fashion to any other sciences, Qur’an and
Hadith need expertise in order to perform the correct assessment and
reach a reliable outcome.
However, the real necessity of Ijtihad comes into motion when there is
no specific text ‘nass’ which outlines an Islamic viewpoint on a
subject. This is done by extrapolating from the sources of law and by
taking advantage from the ideas of the other Mujtahideen, who have
researched the subject at hand.
It is for this reason that Ijtihad is regarded as a means of gaining
contemporary solutions to modern problems using the original sources of
Islamic jurisprudence. It plays a significant role in allowing religion
to be modern and dynamic in its research, hence fulfilling the needs of
the masses. As a result, jurisprudence in the Shi’a school does not
experience a problem of inactivity or stagnation; rather it continues to
advance with the current times. Therefore, it is safe to say that
Ijtihad is essential for Islamic jurisprudence, without which it can no
longer be dynamic and progressive.
Given the significance and essential nature of Ijtihad in Islam, it is
important to note that closing the gates for Ijtihad opposes one of the
fundamental purposes of Islam; that being the all-encompassing religion
that addresses the lifestyle of people in all its aspects. If Ijtihad
was to be stopped, it would cause considerable problems to the
progressive nature of jurisprudence and act as a tool to partially
dissolve religion. Therefore, without contemporary Ijtihad, the
jurisprudence becomes incapable of providing accurate answers to modern
problems.
Role of Usul al-Fiqh in Ijtihad
Usul Al-Fiqh, or the principles of Islamic jurisprudence, may be defined
as the science dealing with the common elements in the procedure of
deducing Islamic laws. In order to grasp this definition it is essential
that we know what the common elements in the procedure of deduction (Istinbat)
are. [7]
Naturally, a Mujtihid, in order to practice Ijtihad, must not only
understand whether a particular act is obligatory, forbidden or
permissible according to Islamic teachings; but also has the knowledge
of the rules and guidelines which allow him to extract such rulings.
For this reason, there is a science that sets a framework in order to
look into every issue and provides with evidence the general verdict in
accordance to Islamic jurisprudence.
This science is better known as the “Principles of Islamic
Jurisprudence” or Usul Al-Fiqh. Its purpose is to determine and specify
the guidelines by which a Mujtahid can extract from the sources of law
and hence deduce Islamic law. In the Shi’a school the sources of Islamic
law are: the Holy Qur’an, Sunnah, Ijma’ (consensus) and ‘Aql
(reasoning). Through these sources a Mujtahid struggles to provide
solutions for every aspect of life.
The Akhbari Tendencies
Akhbarism is an off-shoot of the Shi’a Ithna ‘Ashari School that emerged
around four centuries ago, which differed in the application of Usul
Al-Fiqh. The main point of contention was their denial in the ability to
reach certainty through ‘Aql (reason). Hence, they did not consider it a
source for Ijtihad. This led to a diverging tendency within this school
to reject the concept of Ijtihad in general. Consequently, they believe
that Taqlid should return to the infallible Imam and should be sought
through the Sunnah. [8]
Taqlid and Marja’iyyah
According to Shi’a Fiqh, a believer must be one of three; either a
Mujtahid or a Muqallid or Muhtat (acts with precaution). The vast
majority of Shi’a are Muqallid (one performing Taqlid of a Mujtahid),
due to their lack of expertise in Ijtihad. Those who apply the concept
of precaution, need to have a reasonable level of knowledge of the views
of differing Mujtahideen in order to deduce the most precautious ruling
to act upon.
Therefore, it is necessary for the Shi’a community to have a group of
scholars with the abilities to reach the level of Ijtihad in order to
provide guidance to the vast majority of the community who are
Muqallideen. In fact this is a common theme in the Quran, in which the
necessity of learned individuals is emphasized;
"But why should not
a party from every section of them (the believers) go forth to become
learned in the religion, and to warn their people when they return to
them, that they may beware?" (9:122)
Since it would be impossible for an entire community to be qualified
enough to deduce religious laws from the sources, without resorting to
personal opinion and speculative analogy, a need for the imitation of
those endowed with knowledge by the less knowledgeable arises. This is
so as to follow the Shari’ah in all realms and particularly to provide
solutions based on the law to contemporary issues. It is however of
paramount importance for the protection of the very principles of the
religion that the scholars use the right tools in the inferring of laws,
because if everyone was permitted to change or interpret according to
his opinion, the essence of true Islam would be lost.
Therefore, it is first necessary to understand and ensure that the
foundation and methodologies of Ijtihad are correct according to the
sources, for it to be possible for a community to ensure progression in
the way of Islam. Taqlid can be summarised to be, acting according to
the verdict of a qualified Mujtahid within the sphere of religious laws.
This is quite a logical concept of referring to a specialist that is
used in every branch of knowledge.
Another important issue that is often raised is that of blind following
and whether Taqlid does in anyway encourage unbinding allegiance to a
Mujtahid. Firstly, the Quran detests blind followers in various verses
such as;
Behold, we found
our forefathers agreed on what to believe - and verily, it is but in
their footsteps that we follow. (42:23)
Therefore, such practice is unacceptable in Islam. According to the
Shi’i school of thought, the Muqallid has an obligation to identify a
Mujtahid to the best of their ability, who is most knowledgeable,
performs what is obligatory and stays away from the forbidden as is
shown by the narration below;
It is narrated by Imam Hasan al-Askari (p) from Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq
(p),
"...but if there is anyone
among the fuqaha' (jurists) who is in control over his own self,
protects his religion, suppresses his evil desires and is obedient to
the commands of his Master, then the people should follow him." [9]
Thus, on the contrary to being a practice that encourages blind
following, according to Shi’a Islam, Taqlid encourages vigilance and
keeping one’s eyes open to the practices and the qualities of the
individual from whom religious laws are taken.
Ijtihad, as a concept, has developed and become a central procedure
utilising Usul Al-Fiqh in order to provide Islamic legislation. As time
passed without the presence of an infallible Imam, Taqlid became an
apparent method for the Shi’a to seek guidance from the Mujtahideen. The
high rank Mujtahideen became father figures and were referred to as
Maraja’. Through their Ijtihad, they were able to command authority
among the Shi’a masses and control the destiny of the community with
their wisdom and piety.
Today, the Mujtahideen are revered throughout the Shi’a world and slowly
the process of Ijtihad is being institutionalised to cater for the
millions seeking guidance. Offices of different Mujtahideen provide
answers to the frequently asked questions of their followers on a daily
basis and the relationship between Mujtahid and Muqallid is growing to
form a powerful bond in the wake of the challenges that tomorrow may
present.
This institutionalisation of the relationship between the Marja’ and the
Muqallid has evolved and been labeled as Marja’iyyah, the Supreme
Religious Authority for Shi’a Muslims. In order for the Muqallid to
learn about the deductions of Jurisprudence, his/her Marja’ publishes a
book called Al-Risalah Al-‘Amaliyya, otherwise known as a Code of
Practice for Islamic law. This book contains two main sections, rulings
related to worship and rulings related to worldly interactions. Another
method developed by which the Marja’ keeps contact with the Muqallid is
through a vast network of representatives authorised on behalf of the
Marja’ to cater for the Shi’a in their local areas of residence. More
recently, modern technology has also been utilised especially through
internet services.
The growth of Marja’iyyah in current times, sets many aspirations for
the future of the establishments. With the increasing number of Maraja’
emerging from the seminaries of learning (Hawza), such as Najaf
(Iraq) and Qum (Iran), some Shi’a scholars are beginning to discuss
ideas of establishing a permanent institution incorporating a council of
Maraja’ to facilitate for a forum of discussion amongst specialists in a
variety of fields in order to enhance the capacity of Islamic
jurisprudence in providing solutions for contemporary problems facing
Muslims around the world.
References:
1. Muhammed Baqir Al-Sadr, 1995 Durus Fi ‘Ilm Al-Fiqh, Vol. 1, p.16,
Arabic Edition, Al-Ghadeer, Qum – Iran.
2. Abbas Al-Qummi, Safinat Al-Bihar, Vol. 1, p.22, Arabic Edition, Qum –
Iran.
3. Al-Hurr al-'Amili. Wasa'il al Shi'ah, vol. 18, eleventh of the
chapters on sifatal qadi, hadith 34, Arabic Edition, Qum – Iran.
4. Murtadha Mutahhari, The Principles of Ijtihad in Islam, Al-Serat
Journal, Vol X, No. 1, Translated by John Cooper, Published by Muhammadi
Trust of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
5. Ibid. (under the title: The Kind of Ijtihad which is Forbidden by the
Shari'ah)
6. Muhammad b. Ya’qub al-Kulayni, Usul Al-Kafi, (ed `A. A. Ghaffari, 8
vols., Tehran, 13779), Chapter on “Referring to the Book and the Sunnah”
7. Muhammed Baqir Al-Sadr, A Short History of Ilm Al-Usul, Chapter 2,
Published by Islamic Seminary Publications, Karachi, Pakistan
8. Murtadha Mutahhari, The Principles of Ijtihad in Islam, Al-Serat
Journal, Vol X, No. 1, Translated by John Cooper, Published by Muhammadi
Trust of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
9. Abu Mansur at-Tabarsi 1966, al-Ihtijaj, vo. 2, , p. 263, Arabic
Edition, Najaf – Iraq.
Further Reading:
1. Murtadha Mutahhari, The Principles of Ijtihad in Islam, Al-Serat
Islamic Journal, Vol X, No. 1, Translated by John Cooper, Published by
Muhammadi Trust of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2. Murtadha Muahhari, The Role of Ijtihad in Legislation, Al-Tawhid
Islamic Journal, Vol IV No. 2, Translated by Mahliqa Qara'i
3. Muhammed Baqir Al-Sadr, Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence According
to Shi’i Law, Islamic College for Advanced Studies, First Edition 2003
4. Muhammed Ibraheem Janati, Ijtihad: Its Meaning, Sources, Beginnings
and the Practice of Ra’iy, Al-Tawhid Islamic Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2 &3,
Vol. 6, No. 1, Vol. 7, No. 3, Qum - Iran |