The Fall of
Adam (p.b.u.h)*: A
Comparative Analysis on, “The Original Sin”
By:
Hanif Mohamed
Some
of the most heated debates in the religious circles centers around man’s
supposed need for a Savior, the assumption that God needs a mediator
between man and Himself, and maybe the most contested debate of all
deals with the concept of the original sin (the idea that all men are
inherent sinners because of Adam’s sin). All of these debates stem from
this “original sin ideology”. I can’t begin to understand why this
irrational idea would have such a great following. This idea states that
when Adam and Eve disobeyed God they caused all humans to be damned, and
none of us were there to partake in the act of disobedience. Their
argument is that because Adam is the father of the human race we inherit
his sin. If my father robs a bank will I inherit the title of bank
robber, would any rational person hold me responsible for my father’s
actions? No! And if anyone did say that I was responsible it would be
said of this person, “he is unjust”. Now, it should go without saying
that we can never equate anybody or anything with God, but by accepting
this ideology we are saying that humans are more just than God. (God
Forbid). For God to hold all humans liable for Adam’s sin is unjust. How
can this be when God says that he is Adl 1, the Just?
Read More |
The Parent and Child Relationship
By:
Hanif Mohamed
Introduction: I was asked to deliver a speech to the youth at my
father’s church. Alhamdulillah, I was raised as a Christian and reverted
back to Islam in 1991. I felt like this was a good opportunity to show
Christians that we are well versed with the Bible and that we all share
the same concerns. Insha' Allah for Muslims that don’t know anything
about the Bible or Christian teachings this will be a good place to show
how The Bible and The Qur’an agrees on the subject of the parent and
child relationship. This is only one subject where we agree and there
are many more. This speech was addressed to Christians but its message
is universal. Insha' Allah, it will be well received by all.
Read More |
WOMEN IN ISLAM VERSUS WOMEN IN JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION: THE MYTH &
THE REALITY
(PART 3)
THE VEIL ? (Continuation)
The Islamic veil,
unlike the veil of the Christian tradition, is not a sign of man’s
authority over woman nor is it a sign of woman’s subjection to man. The
Islamic veil, unlike the veil in Jewish tradition, is not a sign of
luxury and distinction of some noble married women. The Islamic veil is
only a sign of modesty with the purpose of protecting women, all women.
The Islamic philosophy is that it is always better to be safe than
sorry. In fact, the Quran is so concerned with protecting women’s bodies
and women’s reputation that a man who dares to falsely accuse a woman of
unchastity will be severely punished:
“And those who launch a charge against chaste
women, and produce not four witnesses (to support their allegation)-flog
them with eighty stripes; and reject their evidence ever after: for such
men are wicked transgressors” (Quran 24:4)
Read More |
WOMEN IN ISLAM VERSUS WOMEN IN THE JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION: THE MYTH
& THE REALITY
(PART 2)
By: Sherif Abdel Azim, Ph.D.
Queens
University,Kingston,Ontario,Canada
THE VEIL ? (Continuation)
What about the Christian tradition? It is
well known that Catholic Nuns have been covering their heads for
hundreds of years, but that is not at all. St.Paul in the New Testament
made some very interesting statements about the veil:
“Now I want you to realize
that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man,
and the head of Christ is God. Every man who prays or prophesies with
his head covered dishonours his head. And every woman who prays or
prophesies with her head uncovered dishonours her head – it is just as
though her head was shaved. If a woman does not cover her head, she
should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to
have her hair cut off or shaved off, she should cover her head. A man
ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but
the woman is the glory of man. For man did not come from woman, but
woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.
For this reason, because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign
of authority on her head”(I
Corinthians 11:3-10).
Read More |
WOMEN IN
ISLAM VERSUS WOMEN IN THE JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION: THE MYTH & THE
REALITY
(PART 1)
By Sherif Abdel
Azim, Ph.D.
Queens
University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
THE VEIL?
Finally let us shed some light on what is
considered in the West as the greatest symbol of women’s oppression and
servitude, the veil or the head cover. Is it true that there is no such
thing as the veil in the Judaeo-Christian tradition? Let us set the
record straight. According to Rabbi Dr.Menachem M.Brayer (Professor of
Biblical Literature at Yeshiva University) in his book, The Jewish woman
in Rabbinic literature, it was the custom of
Jewish women to go out in public with a head covering which, sometimes,
even covered the whole face leaving one eye free.
Read More |
Bible Contradictions
PAUL SAID, "God is
not the author of confusion," (I Corinthians 14:33),
yet never has a
book produced more confusion than the bible! There are
hundreds of
denominations and sects, all using the "inspired Scriptures"
to prove their
conflicting doctrines.
Read More |
Proofs against Christianity
1. AIDS AND HOMOSEXUALITY:
The Holy
Bible gives the cause of this cancer and blight: " Professing
themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of
the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,
and to birds, and four footed beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore
God alsogave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own
hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:
Read More |
|